Whatagraph alternative: pricing, competitors, and alternatives to Whatagraph compared

Whatagraph vs DashThis: which is better value for an agency?

DashThis is far cheaper and Whatagraph is the more capable platform, and for most small agencies that resolves in DashThis' favor. Verified in July 2026, DashThis publishes four tiers billed yearly: Individual at $44 a month for 3 dashboards and 15 sources, Professional at $139 for 10 dashboards and 40 sources, Business at $279 for 25 dashboards and 100 sources, and Standard at $429 for 50 or more dashboards and 200 or more sources. Paid monthly those become $54, $164, $324, and $499. Users are unlimited on every plan, and there is a 14-day free trial that opens up 10 dashboards. An AI Insights Pro add-on runs $19 a month, or $15 billed yearly.

Whatagraph starts at EUR 699 a month billed annually for Max, with Prime quoted on request, so the entry point is roughly five times DashThis Business. What that buys is a genuinely stronger product: better data blending across sources, more polished report design, and stronger account management. Whatagraph makes sense for agencies whose reporting is client-facing at a level where design quality wins renewals, and where the reporting bill is small relative to retainer size.

The meter is the thing to watch on both. DashThis charges by dashboard count, so an agency that gives each client their own dashboard steps up a tier roughly every time it wins a handful of clients. Whatagraph meters source credits, which we cover further down this page. Neither model rewards growth. If you want the numbers side by side with six other tools, our marketing reporting software pricing comparison lists verified rates for sixteen of them, and the DashThis alternative page goes deeper on where its dashboard cap bites.

How much does Whatagraph cost?

As of August 2026 Whatagraph publishes one price and quotes the other. Max starts at EUR 699 per month billed annually and includes 50 or more source credits, where one credit equals one connected data account such as a single Facebook Ads account. Prime is custom priced, and its credit allowance is listed as custom rather than a published number, so treat any specific figure you see quoted elsewhere as unverified. Prime is sold through a demo, and the trial is 14 days on Max with no card required.

Two things follow from that. It is billed in euros, so a US agency carries the conversion, and it is several times the price of DashThis or Swydo. Whatagraph is buying you a genuinely polished report builder, but at 10 clients that works out to roughly EUR 70 per client per month before you connect a second platform for any of them.

Two details worth checking before a Prime quote is signed. First, three features the Prime plan card advertises as included, the custom report domain, public API access and transfer to BigQuery, are marked as paid add-ons in the feature comparison table lower on the same pricing page, and SAML single sign-on is an add-on too. None of the four has a published price. Second, on the Max plan the data cannot leave the platform at all: BigQuery transfer, Looker Studio transfer and the public API are all unavailable. Our full Whatagraph pricing breakdown works through both plans, the credit math at five agency sizes and every add-on.

Swydo vs Whatagraph: which suits a smaller agency?

Swydo is the cheaper entry by a wide margin, and for a small agency that gap decides it. Swydo starts from $62 per month billed annually ($69 monthly) with 10 data sources included, then charges $4.50 per additional source from 11 up to 100. Whatagraph now sells only two plans, Max at EUR 699 per month on annual billing with 50-plus source credits, and Prime as a custom quote. That is a tenfold difference at the entry point.

Both meter the same way, which is the thing to model before you buy. Neither charges per client: they charge per connected data source, so the cost driver is how many ad accounts, analytics properties, and stores each client brings. An agency with 25 clients on two platforms each consumes 50 sources. An agency with 6 clients on eight platforms each consumes 48. Same bill, very different businesses.

Whatagraph earns its premium on polish and hand-holding: guided onboarding, a stronger report builder, and cross-channel blending inside the reports. Swydo is leaner and does the core job of scheduled, branded reporting without the overhead. Neither one puts total ad spend against revenue actually collected, so neither answers whether the account is profitable. Both price lists sit alongside the rest of the field in our marketing reporting software pricing comparison, and the Swydo alternative page goes deeper on the source-credit math.

What is the cheapest Whatagraph alternative?

DashThis at $44 per month for 3 dashboards is the cheapest paid option that does substantially the same job, rising to $139 for 10 dashboards and $279 for 25 with full white labeling. Swydo starts at $62 per month billed annually with 10 data sources included and adds $4.50 per source after that, with full white labeling in the base plan. Databox has a free tier if one user and 3 data sources is enough to start.

All three report on channel metrics. None of them blends ad spend against booked revenue and hands you a profitability number, which is the trade you are making when you optimize purely for report cost.

Does Whatagraph show blended ROAS?

Not as a computed product metric. Whatagraph visualizes the sources you connect and supports cross-source widgets, so a skilled user can assemble something resembling a blended view. The formula is yours to build and yours to maintain as clients add channels.

MixedMetrics treats the blend as the product: total revenue against total spend across every connected account, alongside blended CAC, MER, LTV, and revenue by channel, recalculated as data arrives. Our explainer on blended ROAS versus platform ROAS covers why the platform-reported figure usually overstates itself.

How do Whatagraph source credits actually work?

One source credit equals one connected data account, not one client and not one platform. A single client running Google Ads, Meta Ads, GA4, and Search Console consumes four credits on its own. That is the detail that catches agencies out at renewal: the Max plan advertises 50 or more credits, which sounds generous until you divide it by the four to six accounts a typical multi-channel client needs.

Do the arithmetic on your real book of business before you commit. Ten clients at five connected accounts each is 50 credits, which is the entire Max allowance, at EUR 699 per month. By comparison AgencyAnalytics bills $20 per client with unlimited data sources, and a flat-rate blended dashboard does not meter connections at all. We compared the whole field on published prices in our guide to marketing reporting software for agencies.

Whatagraph vs AgencyAnalytics: which is better for an agency?

Whatagraph is the better report builder and AgencyAnalytics is the better priced platform for most agency sizes. Whatagraph wins on design control, layout flexibility, and the polish of what lands in the client inbox. AgencyAnalytics wins on breadth, with 85+ integrations, a client portal, unlimited users, and a per-client rate of $20 per month on annual billing that stays predictable as the roster grows.

The switching trigger is usually the invoice rather than the feature list. An agency at 10 clients pays roughly EUR 699 at Whatagraph and $200 at AgencyAnalytics for a comparable job, and the euro billing adds conversion risk for US agencies. Our full breakdown sits on the AgencyAnalytics alternative page, with the current numbers in our AgencyAnalytics pricing guide.

The comparison buyers run more often is against a data pipe rather than another reporting platform, because the two answer different questions. Supermetrics vs Whatagraph puts every published tier and add-on price side by side, including why unlimited users on Max is the mirror image of the Supermetrics seat problem.